data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2e01/c2e01fc2e3518ed2936df244eee45828c97e19bf" alt="construction lawyer"
Let me
Represent YOUR
Construction
Interests!
Analyzing legal issues that
impact parties across the
construction industry.
Recent Posts
CONSTRUCTION DEFECT DISPUTES: KNOW YOUR MEASURE OF DAMAGES!!!!!
Posted on 4 January, 2025
Remember this: know your measure of damages in a construction defect dispute. If you don't, as shown below, the outcome can be unforgiving. The measure of damages is one of your most important elements of proof. You are filing suit for damages; thus, knowing what you can reasonably...
CONSIDER ARBITRATION PROVISION IN HOMEBUILDER’S WARRANTY AND PURCHASE-AND-SALE AGREEMENT
Posted on 17 November, 2024
When you enter into a contract with a homebuilder, particularly a tract homebuilder, please consider two things when it comes to dispute resolution: (1) your purchase-and-sale agreement likely contains an arbitration provision, and (2) your limited warranty agreement you get in connection with closing likely also reinforces the arbitration provision,...
FINGER POINTING BETWEEN LIABILITY INSURERS AND “OTHER INSURANCE” PROVISION
Posted on 10 November, 2024
It’s not uncommon when liability insurers point the finger at each other relating to which insurer should be deemed primary, which insurer should be excess, or whether a pro rata contribution between insurers applies. Typically, this needs to be decided by the “other insurance” provision in...
THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES TO EXECUTED DOCUMENTS SUCH AS THE ACCORD AND SATISFACTION DEFENSE
Posted on 22 September, 2024
A federal government contractor in Jackson Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S., 62 Fed.Cl. 84 (Fed.Cl. 2024) sought delay damages against the government. It lost. The reason for the loss is a crucial reminder that documents parties sign ALWAYS matter. ALWAYS!!
In Jackson Construction Co., the contractor’s delay claim was premised on...
CHALLENGING A TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT
Posted on 8 September, 2024
No contractor wants to be terminated for default. It is the harshest contractual recourse. It is a recourse that has implications, particularly in the public sector. However, a party needs to be in a position to support the basis of the termination for default, and the terminated party,...
About The Author
David Adelstein
Phone: (954) 361-4720
Email: Dadelstein@gmail.com
Pages
- About Me (David Adelstein)
- Bid Protests (Florida bid protests and Federal bid protests)
- Construction & Design Defects (and Florida Statutes Chapter 558)
- Construction Contracts
- Construction Liens
- Construction Safety, Workers Compensation Insurance, and Premise Liability Claims
- Delays, Acceleration, and Inefficiency (Lost Productivity)
- Insurance and Performance Bonds
- Payment Bonds Including Miller Act